This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Aims . Non-parametric morphological statistics can be useful in efficiently determining galaxy merger classifications. This work is aimed at comparing the performance of morphological merger classifiers to state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) models. A secondary aim is to produce updated criteria for mergers based on non-parametric morphological statistics. Methods . The Gini coefficient (G), M 20 statistic, and concentration ( C ) were calculated for mock Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program (HSC-SSP) images based on the IllustrisTNG and Horizon-AGN simulations, along with observations from HSC-SSP. IllustrisTNG images were used to find the line that best separates mergers and non-mergers in 2D morphological space with a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. Results . Based on the MCMC results, we classified galaxies with G > (−0.267 ± 0.081) M 20 + (0.143 ± 0.012) or G > (0.162 ± 0.048) C + (0.149 ± 0.12) as mergers. These criteria had precisions levels of 69.5% and 72.3% when applied to previously unseen IllustrisTNG mock HSC-SSP images, respectively. The precision of the morphological classifications are consistent with state-of-the-art ML methods. The morphological classifiers were found to be effective at selecting only pre-mergers. On the other hand, post-merger galaxies are indistinguishable from non-mergers in terms of their G, M 20 , and C values. Morphological classifiers displayed a similar robustness to new data to ML methods up to a redshift of ∼0.52 and maintained the robustness better than ML methods based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in the redshift range 0.52 < z < 1. Conclusions . This work presents updated morphological classifiers with the capacity to achieve a similar level of precision to that of ML-based merger classifiers that have a high robustness with regard to new data. Updated morphological statistics are needed to identify the features of post-merger galaxies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cotter et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: