Key result
Diuretic-induced new-onset diabetes does not increase cardiovascular disease risk in hypertensive patients.
Why the study?
New onset diabetes is common among hypertensive patients treated with antihypertensive drugs, but the cardiovascular impact of diabetes arising during diuretic treatment remains unclear.
Does antihypertensive therapy-induced new onset diabetes increase cardiovascular disease risk in hypertensive patients?
Does antihypertensive therapy-induced new onset diabetes increase cardiovascular disease risk in hypertensive patients?
Apprehensions about new onset diabetes should not influence initial antihypertensive choice or compromise aggressive blood pressure control, as diuretic-induced diabetes does not appear to increase cardiovascular risk.
NOD during diuretic therapy may not raise CVD risk; leaves open whether this modifies drug selection in diabetes-prone hypertensives.
New onset diabetes (NOD) is common among hypertensive patients, whether they are being treated for hypertension or not, and is associated with subsequently increased cardiovascular disease (CVD). Thiazide-like diuretics and beta-blockers are more likely to provoke hyperglycemia when compared with drugs that block the renin-angiotensin system, and calcium channel blockers. However, in contrast to the NOD arising during treatment with other antihypertensive drugs, the NOD that occurs during diuretic treatment, has not been shown to increase CVD, either in clinical trials, or during longer observational studies. In fact, blood pressure reduction achieved by diuretic treatment may avert the expected increase of CVD in NOD. Conventional blood pressure reduction (along with lipid lowering) is the proven approach to preventing CVD in diabetes, in whatever circumstances the diabetes occurs. Apprehensions relating to the potential onset of NOD should not influence the choice of the initial antihypertensive treatment choice, nor should it invariably lead to discontinuation of diuretics (although such a step may reverse hyperglycemia). NOD can also sometimes be eliminated by correcting hypokalemia with a potassium-sparing diuretic, and/or potassium supplementation, or by adding a potassium-conserving antihypertensive drug such as an ACEI, ARB, or an anti-aldosterone agent. If all these stratagems fail (or are unsuitable), and the diuretic is essential to blood pressure control, then hypoglycemic therapy is indicated. NOD does adversely affect quality of life, and is not to be accepted lightly. However, diuretic-induced hyperglycemia can be managed, and should be tolerated if a diuretic is essential for blood pressure control. In summary, the potential for occurrence of NOD certainly needs consideration, but it is not an insurmountable challenge, and must not compromise aggressive blood pressure control, which remains the primary tool for antihypertensive care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
M. H. Alderman (2008) conducted a review in Hypertension and new onset diabetes. Antihypertensive therapy (diuretics) was evaluated. Diuretic-induced new onset diabetes in hypertensive patients does not increase cardiovascular disease risk and should not preclude the use of diuretics for aggressive blood pressure control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: