Key result
DNA nucleofection in NIH3T3 mouse fibroblasts induced a robust, TLR9-independent interferon response, DNA damage, and inhibition of cell proliferation, unlike transfection with a cationic polymer.
Why the study?
Does DNA nucleofection induce an interferon response and inhibit cell proliferation in NIH3T3 mouse fibroblasts compared to cationic polymer transfection?
Does DNA nucleofection induce an interferon response and inhibit cell proliferation in NIH3T3 mouse fibroblasts compared to cationic polymer transfection?
Nucleofection of DNA vectors into mammalian cells induces a robust, TLR9-independent interferon response and inhibits cell proliferation, representing a significant side effect compared to cationic polymer transfection.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Alerts researchers to nucleofection artifacts in fibroblast models; hypothesis-generating for DNA delivery methods in cardiovascular cell studies.
The interferon (IFN) response, induced as a side effect after transfection of nucleic acids into mammalian cells, is known but inadequately described. We followed the IFN response, the fate of cells, and the possible mechanisms leading to this response in NIH3T3 mouse fibroblasts after DNA nucleofection. The gateway destination vector, phGf, and its derivatives encoding toxic and non-toxic variants of the minor structural proteins of polyomaviruses, VP2 and VP3, were used. DNA vector sequences induced in cells the production of high levels of IFN and the upregulation of the IFN-inducible genes, Mx-1, STAT1, IRF1, and IRF7. The IFN response was not restricted to phGf-derived plasmids. In nucleofected cells, upregulation of the modified γ-histone 2A.X indicating DNA damage and inhibition of cell proliferation were also observed. Although 3T3 cells expressed the Toll-like receptor-9 (TLR9) and vectors used for nucleofection contained unmethylated CpGs, signaling leading to IFN induction was found to be TLR9 independent. However, the early activation of nuclear factor-kappa B suggested the participation of this transcription factor in IFN induction. Surprisingly, in contrast to nucleofection, transfection using a cationic polymer induced only a poor IFN response. Together, the results point to a strong side effect of nucleofection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huérfano et al. (2013) studied this question. DNA nucleofection vs. Transfection using a cationic polymer was evaluated on Interferon (IFN) response and inhibition of cell proliferation. DNA nucleofection in NIH3T3 mouse fibroblasts induced a robust, TLR9-independent interferon response, DNA damage, and inhibition of cell proliferation, unlike transfection with a cationic polymer.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: