Key result
Obstructive CAD is linked to significantly higher TGF-β1 and MMP-9 levels vs non-obstructive CAD.
Why the study?
The potential of fibrosis markers TGF-β1 and MMP-9 to differentiate obstructive and non-obstructive stable coronary artery disease for diagnostic purposes was unclear.
Do plasma levels of fibrosis markers TGF-β1 and MMP-9 differentiate between obstructive and non-obstructive coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=80)
Do plasma levels of fibrosis markers TGF-β1 and MMP-9 differentiate between obstructive and non-obstructive coronary artery disease?
p-value: p=<0.001
Plasma levels of fibrosis markers TGF-β1 and MMP-9 are significantly elevated in patients with obstructive CAD compared to those with non-obstructive CAD and healthy individuals, suggesting potential diagnostic utility.
Serum TGF-β1 and MMP-9 levels differ by CAD lesion type; hypothesis-generating for noninvasive differentiation, prospective validation required before clinical use.
Aim. To study the levels of fibrosis markers in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and various types of coronary artery (CA) lesions (obstructive and non-obstructive), to identify possible differences for diagnosing the types of coronary obstruction. Material and methods. The observational study included three groups of patients: with non-obstructive (main group, coronary artery stenosis <50%; n=20) and obstructive (comparison group, hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis according to the results of coronary angiography; n=20) CAD and healthy volunteers (control group; n=40). Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) levels were measured in plasma by enzyme immunoassay. According to the results of echocardiography, all patients included in the study were divided into four groups depending on the type of myocardial remodeling. Results. TGF-β1 levels were significantly higher in patients with obstructive CAD (p=0.008) than in patients with non-obstructive CAD and healthy volunteers (p <0.001). There were no significant differences between the main and control groups (p>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in TGF-β1 levels depending on the type of left ventricular remodeling (p=0.139). The maximum level of MMP-9 was in the group with obstructive coronary disease and significantly differed from the main group (p <0.001) and the control group (p=0.04). Conclusio. The maximum levels of TGF-β1 and MMP-9 were found in the group with obstructive coronary artery disease. The levels of these biomarkers in the main group were statistically different from the values obtained in the control group. Thus, considering the pathogenesis of the development of non-obstructive CAD, the use of fibrosis markers TGF-β1 and MMP-9 may be promising for diagnosing the severity of CA obstruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pakhtusov et al. (2023) conducted an observational in stable coronary artery disease (n=80). Obstructive coronary artery disease vs. Non-obstructive CAD and healthy volunteers was evaluated on TGF-β1 and MMP-9 levels (p=<0.001). Obstructive coronary artery disease was associated with significantly higher levels of TGF-β1 (p=0.008) and MMP-9 (p<0.001) compared to non-obstructive CAD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: