Key result
Obstructive coronary artery disease was associated with significantly higher levels of interleukin-6 compared to non-obstructive disease (median 31 vs 25 pg/ml, p=0.006).
Why the study?
To evaluate pro-inflammatory biomarker levels in patients with obstructive versus non-obstructive CAD to identify potential differences for diagnosing the degree of coronary obstruction.
Are levels of pro-inflammatory biomarkers (IL-1β and IL-6) different in patients with obstructive versus non-obstructive coronary artery disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=60)
No
Are levels of pro-inflammatory biomarkers (IL-1β and IL-6) different in patients with obstructive versus non-obstructive coronary artery disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 31% vs 25%
p-value: p=0.006
IL-6 levels are significantly higher in patients with obstructive CAD compared to non-obstructive CAD, suggesting a link between hemodynamically significant obstruction and highly active vascular wall inflammation.
Biomarker differences may aid CAD obstruction assessment; hypothesis-generating and requires validation before clinical use.
Aim . To study the levels of pro-inflammatory biomarkers in patients with obstructive and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), to identify possible differences for diagnosing the degree of coronary obstruction. Material and methods . The observational study included two groups of patients: with non-obstructive (main group, coronary artery stenosis <50%; n=30) and obstructive (comparison group, hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis according to the results of coronary angiography; n=30) CAD. The levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were measured in plasma using enzyme immunoassay. Results . IL-6 levels were significantly higher in patients with obstructive CAD (p=0.006) than in patients with non-obstructive CAD. There were no significant differences in the level of IL-1β in both groups (p=0.482). When constructing the ROC curve, the threshold value of IL-6 was 26.060 pg/ml. At the level of IL-6 less than this value, CAD was diagnosed with hemodynamically insignificant stenoses of the coronary arteries. Conclusion . The results of this study confirm that in patients with different types of coronary artery lesions, there are differences in the activity of the inflammation process in the arterial wall. IL-6 was higher in the obstructive lesion group, and IL-1β levels did not differ between groups. Thus, it can be assumed that hemodynamically significant obstruction of the coronary arteries develops as a result of highly active inflammation of the vascular wall. Given the presence of a proven biological basis and the available data on the effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies to IL-1β, one cannot exclude their possible benefit in a cohort of patients with CAD and hemodynamically insignificant stenoses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pakhtusov et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary Artery Disease (n=60). Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease vs. Non-obstructive Coronary Artery Disease was evaluated on Interleukin-6 (IL-6) level (pg/ml) (p=0.006). Obstructive coronary artery disease was associated with significantly higher levels of interleukin-6 compared to non-obstructive disease (median 31 vs 25 pg/ml, p=0.006).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: