Key result
Initial shockable rhythm linked to ~4-fold higher likelihood of ROSC in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Why the study?
Outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest depend on factors including initial rhythm type, but predictors of shockable rhythm and ROSC remain to be clarified.
What are the predictors of shockable rhythm and return of spontaneous circulation in patients with witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?
Observational (n=3,927)
Yes
What are the predictors of shockable rhythm and return of spontaneous circulation in patients with witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?
Odds Ratio: 3.889 (95% CI 2.095–7.219)
p-value: p=<0.01
Shockable initial rhythms, younger age, cardiogenic cause, and EMS dispatcher assistance are strong positive predictors of ROSC in OHCA, whereas delays to defibrillation and residential/urban locations negatively impact outcomes.
Introduction: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a global health challenge with an average survival rate of 8%. Outcomes depend on factors such as arrest location, time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), patient demographics, and initial rhythm type. Material and methods: EuReCa_Serbia is part of the EuReCa ONE study on OHCA survival in Europe. It included OHCAs managed by EMS, including pediatric and non-cardiogenic cases. Data were collected per the EuReCa ONE protocol from October 1, 2014, to December 31, 2021. Results: We examined predictors of shockable initial rhythms, ROSC, and hospital admission using univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. OHCAs in areas with over 100,000 inhabitants and at patient residences were significantly less likely to have shockable rhythms (57.4% and 65.4% less likely), while younger age and cardiogenic cause increased the likelihood (1.7 and 8.5 times more likely). Shockable rhythms strongly predicted any ROSC, increasing the likelihood by 3.9 times, and ROSC at hospital admission by 3.3 times. Urban and residential locations reduced the chances of ROSC by 55.8% and 51.1%, respectively. EMS dispatcher assistance improved the likelihood of ROSC at admission by 1.7 times, while a delay of 10 or more minutes from EMS call to defibrillation reduced the likelihood by 86.1%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ristić et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (n=3,927). Initial shockable rhythm vs. Non-shockable initial rhythm was evaluated on Any return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (OR 3.889, 95% CI 2.095-7.219, p=<0.01). An initial shockable rhythm strongly predicted any return of spontaneous circulation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, increasing the likelihood by nearly 4-fold (OR 3.89).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: