Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the 1-year visual and tomographic results of customized crosslinking using excimer laser-assisted epithelium removal and topography-guided irradiation in the treatment of progressive keratoconus. SETTING: Coimbra Ophthalmology Unit, Private Practice, Coimbra, Portugal. DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized clinical trial. METHODS: Eyes with documented progressive keratoconus were enrolled. After de-epithelialization with phototherapeutic keratectomy, customized UV irradiation was performed, designed as 3 concentric circular areas centered on the thinnest point (Mosaic System). Energy exposure was 5.4 J/cm 2 in the outer circle and then increased centripetally to 7.2 J/cm 2 and 10 J/cm 2 . Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive outcomes, and Scheimpflug tomographies (Allegro Oculyzer) were assessed at baseline, and 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: 37 eyes of 32 patients were enrolled in this prospective study. The mean diameter for treated areas was 6.17 ± 0.80 mm, 4.45 ± 0.47 mm, and 2.58 ± 0.14 mm for the outer, medium, and inner circle, respectively. At the 1-year follow-up, the mean CDVA improved significantly from 0.38 ± 0.19 to 0.20 ± 0.16 logMAR ( P < .01), with 34 (91.89%) of the 37 eyes retaining or improving CDVA. The mean preoperative minimum pachymetry decreased from 449.26 ± 41.62 to 443.26 ± 41.06 μm ( P = .02). The maximum keratometry decreased significantly from 58.50 ± 7.84 to 57.05 ± 7.27 diopters ( P < .01). After 1 year, 34 eyes (91.89%) showed no signs of progression. CONCLUSIONS: 1 year postoperatively, patients showed a significant improvement in visual acuity while achieving stabilization of disease progression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gil et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: