Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine (anteroposterior (AP) L(1)-L(4) DXA) is one of the standards for testing bone density (BMD). Whole-body (WB) DXA scanning allows analysis of the L-spine (WB-LS). The objective of this study was (i) to predict the AP L(1)-L(4) BMD from the WB-LS BMD, and (ii) to compare WB and AP L(1)-L(4) T-scores. 132 women participated in the study (age, 50.84+/-9.69 years; range, 21-74 years). AP L(1)-L(4) BMD was measured on a Hologic QDR 4500-A densitometer, and was followed by a WB scan. Linear regression analyses and curve estimations were performed for area, bone mineral content (BMC), BMD and T-scores. Precision errors for BMD from AP scans and WB-LS scans were 1.37% and 1.65%, respectively. The best linear correlations were found for BMD, followed by the T-scores (R = 0.882 and 0.871; p<0.001). A power model for BMC (R(2) = 0.630) and a model S for BMD and the scanned area (R(2) = 0.841 and 0.539) were built. Discordant classification between AP L(1)-L(4) and WB T-scores was found in 12.73% and 19.09% cases, respectively. WB T-score cut-off values of -2.35 and -0.90 produced the best sensitivity-to-specificity ratio in the diagnosis of lumbar spine osteoporosis and low bone mass. In conclusion, WB-LS analysis may provide data for the indirect estimation of spinal BMD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mihail Boyanov (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: