Key result
Inactivity alerts from fitness trackers increased breaks from sitting by 7.2 breaks per day compared to baseline and reversal phases without alerts (combined p<0.05).
Why the study?
Do fitness tracker inactivity alerts increase breaks from sitting in obese older adults?
RCT (n=10)
Randomization tests
Do fitness tracker inactivity alerts increase breaks from sitting in obese older adults?
Mean Difference: 7.2
p-value: p=< .05
Inactivity alerts from fitness trackers modestly increase daily breaks from sitting in obese older adults, offering a simple strategy to reduce sedentary time.
Alerts may increase sitting breaks among obese older adults; extends N-of-1 methods to pragmatic sedentary interventions.
BACKGROUND: Frequent breaks from sitting could improve health. Many commercially available fitness trackers deliver vibration alerts that could be used to cue sitting breaks. As a potentially pragmatic approach to promote frequent breaks from sitting, we tested the efficacy of inactivity alerts among obese older adults, a highly sedentary population. METHODS: We conducted 10 sequential N-of-1 (single-case) experimental ABA trials. Participants (mean age = 68, mean BMI = 35) were monitored for a baseline phase ("A1") followed by an intervention phase ("B"). The intervention was then removed and participants were monitored to test an experimental effect (reversal "A2" phase). Total time in the study was limited to 25 days. During the intervention phase ("B"), participants used fitness trackers to stand up or move every time they received an alert (every 15 or 20 minutes of inactivity). Participants wore activPAL devices to measure breaks from sitting each day. Randomization tests were used to determine whether the number of breaks was significantly higher during the "B" phase than the two "A" phases. RESULTS: Breaks were higher by 7.2 breaks per day during the "B" phase compared to the mean of the "A" phases. Seven out of 10 participants had more sitting breaks during the intervention phase which subsequently decreased during the reversal "A2" phase (combined p-value < .05). CONCLUSION: Inactivity alert features within commercially available devices are efficacious for promoting modest improvements in breaks from sitting among older adults with obesity and could be a simple health-promoting strategy in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosenberg et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Obesity and sedentary behavior (n=10). Inactivity alerts in fitness trackers vs. No alerts (baseline and reversal phases) was evaluated on Breaks from sitting each day (MD 7.2 breaks per day, p=< .05). Inactivity alerts from fitness trackers increased breaks from sitting by 7.2 breaks per day compared to baseline and reversal phases without alerts (combined p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: