Key result
Asynchronous ventricular pacing worsens post-Fontan hemodynamics, driving higher LAP and lower cardiac output.
Why the study?
Bradycardia requiring pacing is common after the Fontan operation, but the optimal pacing mode for Fontan patients is unknown and critical due to potential hemodynamic deterioration.
Population
21 patients aged 2 to 18 years after Fontan operation in ICU
Comparison
Atrial, ventricular, and dual-chamber pacing modes
Design
Cross-over trial
Authors
Loading...
May inform acute pacing choices in Fontan patients; hypothesis-generating for randomized trials on long-term outcomes.
RCT (n=21)
Barber et al. (2005) conducted an RCT in Fontan physiology (n=21). Asynchronous ventricular (VOO) pacing vs. Dual-chamber (DOO) and atrial (AOO) pacing was evaluated on Hemodynamic parameters including mean left atrial pressure, mean pulmonary artery pressure, mean arterial blood pressure, and indexed cardiac output. Asynchronous ventricular pacing caused worse hemodynamics, including higher LAP (9.4 vs 6.8 DOO and 5.4 AOO) and lower cardiac output (3.0 vs 3.5 DOO and 3.9 AOO) in post-Fontan patients.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: