Key result
Permanent ventricular pacing in single ventricle patients is linked to ~280% higher death or transplant risk.
Why the study?
The need for permanent ventricular pacing in single ventricle patients may be associated with additional adverse long-term outcomes, but the attributable risk and modifiable factors were not quantified.
Cohort (n=449)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant caution with chronic pacing in single ventricle patients; leaves open optimal site selection for prospective trials.
BACKGROUND Palliation of the single ventricle (SV) circulation is associated with a burden of lifelong complications. Previous studies have identified that the need for a permanent ventricular pacing system (PPMv) may be associated with additional adverse long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to quantify the attributable risk of PPMv in patients with SV, and to identify modifiable risk factors. METHODS This international study was sponsored by the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society. Centers contributed baseline and longitudinal data for functionally SV patients with PPMv. Enrollment was at implantation. Controls were matched 1:1 to PPMv subjects by ventricular morphology and sex, identified within center, and enrolled at matched age. Primary outcome was transplantation or death. RESULTS In total, 236 PPMv subjects and 213 matched controls were identified (22 centers, 9 countries). Median age at enrollment was 5.3 years (quartiles: 1.5-13.2 years), follow-up 6.9 years (3.4-11.6 years). Median percent ventricular pacing (Vp) was 90.8% (25th-75th percentile: 4.3%-100%) in the PPMv cohort. Across 213 matched pairs, multivariable HR for death/transplant associated with PPMv was 3.8 (95% CI 1.9-7.6; P < 0.001). Within the PPMv population, higher Vp (HR: 1.009 per %; P = 0.009), higher QRS z-score (HR: 1.19; P = 0.009) and nonapical lead position (HR: 2.17; P = 0.042) were all associated with death/transplantation. CONCLUSIONS PPMv in patients with SV is associated with increased risk of heart transplantation and death, despite controlling for increased associated morbidity of the PPMv cohort. Increased Vp, higher QRS z-score, and nonapical ventricular lead position are all associated with higher risk of adverse outcome and may be modifiable risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chubb et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Single ventricle circulation (n=449). Permanent ventricular pacing system (PPMv) vs. Matched controls without PPMv was evaluated on Transplantation or death (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.9-7.6, p=< 0.001). Permanent ventricular pacing in patients with single ventricle circulation was associated with an increased risk of death or transplantation (HR 3.8; 95% CI 1.9-7.6; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: