Key result
Coping Effectiveness Training fails to improve emotional well-being over standard care despite short-term control gains.
Why the study?
Impaired emotional well-being negatively affects health outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure, and the effectiveness of Coping Effectiveness Training in this population needed evaluation.
Does a nurse-led Coping Effectiveness Training (CET) group intervention improve emotional well-being in patients with chronic heart failure?
RCT (n=103)
randomized
Does a nurse-led Coping Effectiveness Training (CET) group intervention improve emotional well-being in patients with chronic heart failure?
A nurse-led Coping Effectiveness Training intervention did not significantly improve emotional well-being or health-related quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure compared to standard care.
CET did not improve emotional well-being or HRQoL in CHF; leaves open whether refined interventions benefit subgroups without baseline distress.
BACKGROUND: Impaired emotional well-being has detrimental effects on health outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). AIMS: To evaluate a nurse-led Coping Effectiveness Training (CET) group intervention for patients with CHF. It was hypothesized that CET would increase emotional well-being (primary outcome) and health-related quality (HRQoL) of life and improve clinical outcomes. Furthermore, changes in appraisal and coping as mediators of the intervention effect were examined. METHODS: Participants were randomized to either control group (n=51) receiving standard health care or CET intervention group (n=52). Self-assessments of positive affect, negative affect, depression, anxiety, HRQoL, illness perception, coping strategies and social support were performed pre- and post-intervention and after six weeks, six months and 12 months. Time to death and hospitalizations were measured during the entire follow-up (median 35 months, interquartile range 11 months). RESULTS: No significant improvements for emotional well-being and HRQoL in the intervention group compared with the control group were found. After excluding patients with clinical anxiety and depression at baseline the intervention group had significantly lower negative affect (p = 0.022). There were no significant differences regarding cardiovascular events between the groups. The intervention group had greater sense of control over their illness in the short-term (p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: CET intervention was found to increase sense of control over the illness in the short term. Psychosocial support programmes, like CET, for patients with CHF is currently lacking evidence for implementing in clinical practice. However, the results provide a basis for future studies with a modified CET intervention design and increased study size.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bose et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in chronic heart failure (CHF) (n=103). Coping Effectiveness Training (CET) vs. standard health care was evaluated on emotional well-being. Coping Effectiveness Training did not significantly improve emotional well-being compared to standard care, but increased short-term sense of control over the illness (p=0.036).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: