Key result
Normobaric hyperoxia reversibly reduces microvascular density and vessel diameter in preclinical models.
Why the study?
Hyperoxia and hyperbaric oxygen therapy are believed to influence angiogenesis and tissue perfusion, but quantification of hyperoxia-driven microvascular changes and their reversibility is needed.
Does normobaric and hyperbaric hyperoxia alter sublingual microvascular perfusion in male rabbits?
Does normobaric and hyperbaric hyperoxia alter sublingual microvascular perfusion in male rabbits?
p-value: p=<0.01
Normobaric and hyperbaric hyperoxia elicit reversible physiological control of sublingual mucosa blood perfusion, with hyperbaric conditions avoiding microvascular vasoconstriction to maintain peak tissue perfusion.
New model quantifies reversible hyperoxia effects on microcirculation; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Hyperoxia and hyperbaric oxygen therapy can restore oxygen tensions in tissues distressed by ischemic injury and poor vascularization and is believed to also yield angiogenesis and regulate tissue perfusion. The aim of this study was to develop a model in which hyperoxia-driven microvascular changes could be quantified and to test the hypothesis that microcirculatory responses to both normobaric (NB) and hyperbaric (HB) hyperoxic maneuvers are reversible. Sublingual mucosa microcirculation vessel density, proportion of perfused vessels, vessel diameters, microvascular flow index, macrohemodynamic, and blood gas parameters were examined in male rabbits breathing sequential O2/air mixtures of 21%, 55%, 100%, and return to 21% during NB (1.0 bar) and HB (2.5 bar) conditions. The results indicate that NB hyperoxia (55% and 100%) produced significant decreases in microvascular density and vascular diameters (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively) accompanied by significant increases in systolic and mean arterial blood pressure (p<0.05, respectively) with no changes in blood flow indices when compared to NB normoxia. HB normoxia/hyperoxia resulted in significant decreases in microvascular density (p<0.05), a transient rise in systolic blood pressure at 55% (p<0.01), and no changes in blood vessel diameter and blood flow indices when compared to NB hyperoxia. All microcirculation parameters reverted back to normal values upon return to NB normoxia. We conclude that NB/HB hyperoxia-driven changes elicit reversible physiological control of sublingual mucosa blood perfusion in the presence of steady cardiovascular function and that the absence of microvascular vasoconstriction during HB conditions suggests a beneficial mechanism associated with maintaining peak tissue perfusion states.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milstein et al. (2016) studied Healthy (animal model). Normobaric and hyperbaric hyperoxia vs. Normobaric normoxia (21% O2 at 1.0 bar) was evaluated on Sublingual mucosa microcirculation vessel density and vascular diameters (p=<0.01). Normobaric hyperoxia significantly decreased microvascular density (p<0.01) and vascular diameters (p<0.05), which reverted to normal upon return to normobaric normoxia in male rabbits.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: