Key result
Medly telemonitoring maintains care continuity, but fragmented systems and alert fatigue threaten long-term sustainability.
Why the study?
The COVID-19 pandemic challenged traditional in-person care delivery, prompting rapid expansion and adoption of telemonitoring programs for chronic conditions like heart failure.
Telemonitoring programs provided significant value for care continuity during the COVID-19 pandemic, though challenges in system integration and alert-driven interactions need addressing for sustainability.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports telemonitoring for continuity amid disruptions; leaves open scalable workflow integration for routine cardiovascular care.
BACKGROUND: To minimize the spread and risk of a COVID-19 outbreak, societal norms have been challenged with respect to how essential services are delivered. With pressures to reduce the number of in-person ambulatory visits, innovative models of telemonitoring have been used during the pandemic as a necessary alternative to support access to care for patients with chronic conditions. The pandemic has led health care organizations to consider the adoption of telemonitoring interventions for the first time, while others have seen existing programs rapidly expand. OBJECTIVE: At the Toronto General Hospital in Ontario, Canada, the rapid expansion of a telemonitoring program began on March 9, 2020, in response to COVID-19. The objective of this study was to understand the experiences related to the expanded role of a telemonitoring program under the changing conditions of the pandemic. METHODS: A single-case qualitative study was conducted with 3 embedded units of analysis. Semistructured interviews probed the experiences of patients, clinicians, and program staff from the Medly telemonitoring program at a heart function clinic in Toronto, Canada. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis as well as Eakin and Gladstone's value-adding approach to enhance the analytic interpretation of the study findings. RESULTS: A total of 29 participants were interviewed, including patients (n=16), clinicians (n=9), and operational staff (n=4). Four themes were identified: (1) providing care continuity through telemonitoring; (2) adapting telemonitoring operations for a more virtual health care system; (3) confronting virtual workflow challenges; and (4) fostering a meaningful patient-provider relationship. Beyond supporting virtual visits, the program's ability to provide a more comprehensive picture of the patient's health was valued. However, issues relating to the lack of system integration and alert-driven interactions jeopardized the perceived sustainability of the program. CONCLUSIONS: With the reduction of in-person visits during the pandemic, virtual services such as telemonitoring have demonstrated significant value. Based on our study findings, we offer recommendations to proactively adapt and scale telemonitoring programs under the changing conditions of an increasingly virtual health care system. These include revisiting the scope and expectations of telemedicine interventions, streamlining virtual patient onboarding processes, and personalizing the collection of patient information to build a stronger virtual relationship and a more holistic assessment of patient well-being.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wali et al. (2021) studied Heart failure (n=29). Medly telemonitoring program was evaluated on Experiences related to the expanded role of a telemonitoring program under the changing conditions of the pandemic. Qualitative interviews with 29 participants showed the Medly telemonitoring program provided care continuity, though lack of system integration and alert-driven interactions jeopardized sustainability.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: