Key result
East Asian patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were less likely than European patients to undergo genetic testing (55% vs 85%, P<0.0001) or receive an ICD (19% vs 36%, P=0.037).
Why the study?
Clinical studies of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are over-represented by individuals of European ethnicity, with less known about other ethnic groups.
Are there clinical differences and health disparities based on ethnicity in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=836)
No
Are there clinical differences and health disparities based on ethnicity in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Significant health disparities exist in access to genetic testing and ICD implantation among ethnic minorities with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, particularly East Asians, compared to patients of European descent.
Ethnic disparities may exist in HCM care; hypothesis-generating for equity-focused interventions and prospective confirmation.
Background: Clinical studies of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are over-represented by individuals of European ethnicity, with less known about other ethnic groups. We investigated differences between patients in a multiethnic Australian hypertrophic cardiomyopathy population. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 836 unrelated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy probands attending a specialized clinic between 2002 and 2020. Major ethnic groups were European (n=611), East Asian (n=75), South Asian (n=58), and Middle Eastern and North African (n=68). The minor ethnicity groups were Oceanian (n=9), People of the Americas (n=7), and African (n=8). One-way ANOVA with Dunnett post hoc test and Bonferroni adjustment were performed. Results: Mean age of the major ethnic groups was 54.9±16.9 years, and 527 (65%) were male. Using the European group as the control, East Asian patients had a lower body mass index (29 versus 25 kg/m 2 , P <0.0001). South Asians had a lower prevalence of atrial fibrillation (10% versus 31%, P =0.024). East Asians were more likely to have apical hypertrophy (23% versus 6%, P <0.0001) and Middle Eastern and North African patients more likely to present with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (46% versus 34%, P =0.0003). East Asians were less likely to undergo genetic testing (55% versus 85%, P <0.0001) or have an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implanted (19% versus 36%, P =0.037). East Asians were more likely to have a causative variant in a gene other than MYBPC3 or MYH7 , whereas Middle Eastern and North African and South Asians had the highest rates of variants of uncertain significance (27% and 21%, P <0.0001). Conclusions: There are few clinical differences based on ethnicity, but importantly, we identify health disparities relating to access to genetic testing and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator use. Unless addressed, these gaps will likely widen as we move towards precision-medicine–based care of individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Butters et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (n=836). East Asian ethnicity vs. European ethnicity was evaluated on Genetic testing (p=<0.0001). East Asian patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were less likely than European patients to undergo genetic testing (55% vs 85%, P<0.0001) or receive an ICD (19% vs 36%, P=0.037).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: