Key result
EMS arrival linked to ~2.5-fold higher 30-day mortality in acute heart failure.
Why the study?
The association of emergency medical services use with emergency department management and short-term outcomes in acute heart failure patients was unclear.
Does arrival by emergency medical services (EMS) predict 30-day mortality in patients with acute heart failure presenting to the emergency department?
Observational (n=500)
Yes
Does arrival by emergency medical services (EMS) predict 30-day mortality in patients with acute heart failure presenting to the emergency department?
Odds Ratio: 2.54 (95% CI 1.11–5.81)
Absolute Event Rate: 14.3% vs 4.9%
p-value: p=0.027
Arrival by EMS in acute heart failure patients is associated with more severe clinical presentation and is an independent predictor of 30-day mortality.
EMS arrival flags higher-risk acute HF for closer monitoring; extends risk models but leaves causal pathways and interventions open.
BACKGROUND: Acute heart failure patients are often encountered in emergency departments (ED) from 11% to 57% using emergency medical services (EMS). Our aim was to evaluate the association of EMS use with acute heart failure patients' ED management and short-term outcomes. METHODS: This was a sub-analysis of a European EURODEM study. Data on patients presenting with dyspnoea were collected prospectively from European EDs. Patients with ED diagnosis of acute heart failure were categorized into two groups: those using EMS and those self-presenting (non- EMS). The independent association between EMS use and 30-day mortality was evaluated with logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 500 acute heart failure patients, with information about the arrival mode to the ED, 309 (61.8%) arrived by EMS. These patients were older (median age 80 vs. 75 years, p < 0.001), more often female (56.4% vs. 42.1%, p = 0.002) and had more dementia (18.7% vs. 7.2%, p < 0.001). On admission, EMS patients had more often confusion (14.2% vs. 2.1%, p < 0.001) and higher respiratory rate (24/min vs. 21/min, p = 0.014; respiratory rate > 30/min in 17.1% patients vs. 7.5%, p = 0.005). The only difference in ED management appeared in the use of ventilatory support: 78.3% of EMS patients vs. 67.5% of non- EMS patients received supplementary oxygen (p = 0.007), and non-invasive ventilation was administered to 12.5% of EMS patients vs. 4.2% non- EMS patients (p = 0.002). EMS patients were more often hospitalized (82.4% vs. 65.9%, p < 0.001), had higher in-hospital mortality (8.7% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.014) and 30-day mortality (14.3% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.001). The use of EMS was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (OR = 2.54, 95% CI 1.11-5.81, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Most acute heart failure patients arrive at ED by EMS. These patients suffer from more severe respiratory distress and receive more often ventilatory support. EMS use is an independent predictor of 30-day mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harjola et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Acute heart failure (n=500). Emergency medical services (EMS) use vs. Self-presenting (non-EMS) was evaluated on 30-day mortality (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.11-5.81, p=0.027). Arrival at the emergency department by emergency medical services was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality in acute heart failure patients (OR 2.54).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: