Key result
Bimakalim significantly increases LVEF and stroke volume while reducing peripheral resistance versus placebo.
Why the study?
The cardiac hemodynamic effects of bimakalim, a new potassium channel opener, were not previously evaluated in humans.
Does bimakalim alter cardiac hemodynamics in normal volunteers?
RCT (n=12)
Double-blind
Cross-over
Does bimakalim alter cardiac hemodynamics in normal volunteers?
p-value: p=0.0003
Bimakalim acts as a potent vasodilator that significantly increases LVEF and stroke volume in healthy volunteers, indicating potential utility for patients with compromised LV function.
Bimakalim improves hemodynamics in normals; extends vasodilator data but leaves open translation to patients with LV dysfunction.
The cardiac hemodynamic effects of bimakalim, a new potassium channel opener, were evaluated in 12 normal volunteers by echocardiography (ECHO)/Doppler in a placebo-controlled, randomized double-blind, cross-over, dose-ranging study. A single oral dose (0.25-1 mg) was given at weekly intervals. Hemodynamic measurements were made at 0, 90, 120, and 240 min after drug intake and ECHO/Doppler was performed at 0 and 90 min. Reproducibility of the ECHO/Doppler study was assessed by comparing predose baseline values of the four different phases of treatment (placebo and 0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg) by analysis of variance (ANOVA), which showed no significant differences for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Doppler-derived stroke volume (SV), total peripheral resistance (TPR), and peak mitral early to late velocity ratio (PEV/PAV). ANOVA showed significant increases in LVEF (p = 0.0003) and SV (p = 0.03), however, and decreases in TPR (p = 0.002) and PEV/PAV (p = 0.005) after bimakalim treatment. Heart rate (HR) showed a dose-dependent increase, but systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP) did not change with bimakalim. Despite vasodilatory headaches, none of the volunteers discontinued the study. Bimakalim appears to be a potent vasodilating drug that may have an important role in management of patients with compromised LV function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Senior et al. (1993) conducted an RCT in Healthy volunteers (n=12). Bimakalim vs. Placebo was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p=0.0003). Bimakalim significantly increased left ventricular ejection fraction (p=0.0003) and stroke volume (p=0.03), and decreased total peripheral resistance (p=0.002) compared to placebo.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: