Key result
Observational study protocol compares epicardial fat tissue in hemodialysis patients with and without malnutrition.
Why the study?
The role of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) in cardiovascular risk assessment among hemodialysis patients with malnutrition is unclear.
Does epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) differ between hemodialysis patients with and without malnutrition, and can it be used to determine cardiovascular risk?
Observational (n=56)
Does epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) differ between hemodialysis patients with and without malnutrition, and can it be used to determine cardiovascular risk?
Our aim was to compare EAT in HD patients with and without malnutrition.Our second objective was to determine whether the role of EAT in HD patients can be used to determine cardiovascular risk factor in HD patients with malnutrition. Materials and MethodsFifty-six patients were included in the study who were receiving HD therapy for ESRD.The study was approved by the local ethical committee (date: 25/10/2017, decision no: 227199).Written consent was taken from all of the patients included in the study.Study popülation were selected from patients who were eligible of consciousness to respond the questionnaire.Those who were 18 years or older age, who had been on HD therapy for at least 3 months and had not received psychiatric treatment in the last 3 months, were included in the study.Malignancy, infection and tuberculosis, and those who did not want to participate in the study were excluded from the study.All patients underwent bicarbonate hemodialysis.The mean blood flow rate was maintained at 280-350 mL/ min and the Kt/V value of all patients was >1.2 calculated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Demır et al. (2019) conducted an observational in End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (n=56). Malnutrition vs. Hemodialysis patients without malnutrition was evaluated on Epicardial fat tissue (EAT) and cardiovascular risk factors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: