Key result
Combined abnormal post-exercise BP and HR recovery linked to ~95% higher incident CAD risk.
Why the study?
The combined prognostic value of exercise heart rate and blood pressure recovery parameters for predicting coronary artery disease and arterial hypertension was unclear.
Does the combination of abnormal exercise heart rate and blood pressure parameters improve the prediction of incident coronary artery disease and arterial hypertension compared to single parameters in non-CAD patients?
Cohort (n=830)
Does the combination of abnormal exercise heart rate and blood pressure parameters improve the prediction of incident coronary artery disease and arterial hypertension compared to single parameters in non-CAD patients?
Relative Risk: 1.95 (95% CI 1.28–2.98)
p-value: p=.011
The combination of abnormal blood pressure and heart rate responses during and after exercise testing provides stronger prognostic value for incident CAD and hypertension than either parameter alone.
Combined BP/HR abnormalities may aid CAD and hypertension prediction in non-CAD patients; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Delayed blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) decline at recovery post-exercise are independent predictors of incident coronary artery disease (CAD). Delayed BP recovery and exaggerated BP response to exercise are independent predictors of future arterial hypertension (AH). This study sought to examine whether the combination of two exercise parameters provides additional prognostic value than each variable alone. A total of 830 non-CAD patients (374 normotensive) were followed for new-onset CAD and/or AH for 5 years after diagnostic exercise testing (ET). At the end of follow-up, patients without overt CAD underwent a second ET. Stress imaging modalities and coronary angiography, where appropriate, ruled out CAD. New-onset CAD was detected in 110 participants (13.3%) whereas AH was detected in 41 former normotensives (11.0%). The adjusted (for confounders) relative risk (RR) of CAD in abnormal BP and HR recovery patients was 1.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-2.98; P=.011) compared with delayed BP and normal HR recovery patients and 1.71 (95% CI, 1.08-2.75; P=.014) compared with normal BP and delayed HR recovery patients. The adjusted RR of AH in normotensives with abnormal BP recovery and response was 2.18 (95% CI, 1.03-4.72; P=.047) compared with delayed BP recovery and normal BP response patients and 2.48 (95% CI, 1.14-4.97; P=.038) compared with normal BP recovery and exaggerated BP response individuals. In conclusion, the combination of two independent exercise predictors is an even stronger CAD/AH predictor than its components.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liakos et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease and arterial hypertension (n=830). Abnormal blood pressure and heart rate recovery post-exercise vs. Delayed blood pressure and normal heart rate recovery was evaluated on New-onset coronary artery disease (RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.28-2.98, p=.011). The combination of abnormal blood pressure and heart rate recovery post-exercise increased the risk of incident CAD compared with delayed BP and normal HR recovery (RR 1.95; 95% CI 1.28-2.98; P=.011).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: