Key result
The Pen-side rapid test demonstrated moderate diagnostic accuracy for detecting African Swine Fever antibodies in wild boar, with a sensitivity of 81.8%, specificity of 95.9%, and an AUC of 0.83.
Why the study?
Does a commercial serological test kit (Pen-side) accurately detect African Swine Fever in wild boars when used in the field compared to the laboratory?
Cross-Sectional (n=113)
Does a commercial serological test kit (Pen-side) accurately detect African Swine Fever in wild boars when used in the field compared to the laboratory?
The Pen-side test provides rapid, cost-effective field diagnosis of African Swine Fever in wild boars with acceptable sensitivity and specificity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support cautious field screening in wild boar; leaves open need for larger prospective validation studies.
African swine fever (ASF) is one of the most important and complex infectious diseases affecting pigs ( Sus scrofa ). The disease has been present in Sardinia, Italy, since 1978. Factors influencing the presence of the disease on the island are the presence of illegally bred pigs, uncontrolled movements of animals, and local traditions. Implementation of public health programs is essential for controlling ASF. The use of new diagnostic techniques on both wild boar (WB) and illegally bred pigs would provide tools for faster and more inexpensive control of the disease. We evaluated a commercial serological test kit (Pen-side [PS]) for use in the field. We sampled 113 hunter-harvested WB during the 2014-15 season, collecting blood and lung samples to conduct serological analyses and to screen for the ASF virus. Although the sensitivity (81.8%) and specificity (95.9%) of tests performed in the field were reduced compared to the same test in laboratory, they nevertheless allowed for rapid diagnosis and reduced unnecessary carcass destruction. The test, conducted in the field, was less expensive than in the laboratory and required less manpower. Therefore, we conclude that the combined use of antibody PS test and antigen PS test may be a valuable emergency management method during an outbreak as well as a useful tool for conducting regular monitoring activities as a preventive policy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cappai et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in African Swine Fever (n=113). Pen-side (PS) rapid test vs. ELISA or IPMA was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (Area Under the ROC Curve) (AUC 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.96, p=0.014). The Pen-side rapid test demonstrated moderate diagnostic accuracy for detecting African Swine Fever antibodies in wild boar, with a sensitivity of 81.8%, specificity of 95.9%, and an AUC of 0.83.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: