Key result
Three-step sampling with lateral flow devices helps assess African swine fever spread to prioritize culling.
Why the study?
EU legislation requires thorough epidemiological investigation to determine the extent of ASF infection in affected pig farms, but practical and efficient sampling strategies are needed.
Observational (n=11,631)
Yes
A three-step sampling strategy using lateral flow devices can efficiently assess the spread of African swine fever in affected pig farms to guide culling strategies.
May expedite ASF extent mapping in affected farms; leaves open reliability for routine EU investigations without further validation.
In the case of African swine fever (ASF) outbreaks in pig farms, EU legislation requires a thorough epidemiological investigation to determine, among other tasks, the extent of infection in the affected farm. The main aim of this study was to implement a reliable sampling strategy to quickly obtain an overview of the extent of ASF virus spread in an affected pig farm. We developed and tested a three-step approach: (i) identification of sub-units within the affected farm, (ii) categorization of sub-units, and (iii) targeted selection of animals for testing. We used commercially available lateral flow devices (LFDs) to detect ASF antigen and antibodies under field conditions and compared them with routinely performed laboratory tests (qPCR, ELISA, IPT). The study was conducted in three commercial farms in Latvia that were affected by ASF in July 2020. One of the affected farms was relatively small with only 31 pigs, whereas the other two were large with 1800 and 9800 animals, respectively. The approach proved to be helpful and practical for efficient and reliably assess the ASF situation on the farm and to identify sub-units within a farm where infected animals are present and sub-units which might (still) be free of infection. This important epidemiological information helps to better estimate the high-risk period and to track the potential spread of infection outside the farm. It allows also to prioritize culling and, if appropriate, to pursue a partial culling strategy taking into account the absence of clinical signs, implemented biosecurity measures, quarantine and negative test results, among others. This might be of interest for large commercial farms where the infection was identified very early and has not yet spread widely. Due to its limited sensitivity, the antigen LFD test is useful for testing animals showing signs of disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lamberga et al. (2022) conducted an observational in African swine fever (ASF) (n=11,631). Three-step sampling approach and lateral flow devices (LFDs) vs. Routinely performed laboratory tests (qPCR, ELISA, IPT) was evaluated on Detection of ASF antigen and antibodies to assess virus spread. A three-step sampling approach using lateral flow devices practically assessed African swine fever spread across 3 affected farms, helping to identify infected sub-units and prioritize culling.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: