Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary Aerial counts of elephants made three times a day over the same region tended to be consistent if due allowance is made for observed movements to and from the area. There was little difference between observers when two were present. Ground counts made on the same day as the aerial counts tended to return lower totals, due probably to elephants in dense vegetation being hidden from the ground observer but visible from the air. It is concluded that aerial survey is the most efficient way of counting elephants, at least in the Queen Elizabeth National Park.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S. K. Eltringham (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: