Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Alcohols produced from waste or lignocellulosic materials with advanced production techniques constitute a sustainable alternative as diesel fuel component. With respect to ethanol, the higher heating value of n-butanol together with its better miscibility with diesel fuel and lower hydrophilic character suggest that butanol is a better option as blending component for diesel fuels. A Euro 6 Nissan Qashqai 1.5 dCi light-duty vehicle was tested following the NEDC (New European Driving Cycle) on a chassis dynamometer located in a climatic chamber with different blends of diesel and n-butanol. Room temperatures were set at 24 °C and −7 °C. Butanol blends up to 16% (volume basis) showed benefits in particle number and particulate matter emissions upstream of the DPF at any ambient condition, this implying a reduction in the frequency of regeneration. Benefits in engine efficiency were observed at cold ambient temperature (−7 °C), just when the efficiency is poorest. Increases in NOx emissions were observed only at cold ambient temperature (−7 °C), while increases in CO and hydrocarbon emissions were found at any temperature. Blends with n-butanol content above 13% led to startability problems at cold ambient conditions. In general, including n-butanol as a blend component is beneficial for both performance and particulate emissions, but the blend concentration is limited by startability problems at very low ambient temperature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lapuerta et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: