Key result
Ticagrelor doubles thrombus reduction at 6 hours versus clopidogrel in diabetic CVD patients.
Why the study?
T2DM is associated with increased platelet reactivity and hypo-response to antiplatelet drugs, and ticagrelor benefits in T2DM patients were not statistically significant in prior trials.
Does ticagrelor improve antithrombotic effects compared to clopidogrel in type-2 diabetic patients with cardiovascular disease?
RCT (n=20)
2 treatment-sequence, crossover-design
Does ticagrelor improve antithrombotic effects compared to clopidogrel in type-2 diabetic patients with cardiovascular disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 40% vs 20%
p-value: p=<0.05
Ticagrelor provides faster and more potent antithrombotic and antiplatelet effects than clopidogrel in patients with type-2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
May support ticagrelor preference for rapid effect in T2DM-CVD; hypothesis-generating and leaves clinical outcomes open.
Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus [T2DM] is associated with increased platelet reactivity and hypo-response to antiplatelet drugs. Ticagrelor, with its faster and more potent antiplatelet effects, was shown to reduce adverse events more than clopidogrel in the overall CAD patient population of PLATO trial, but the benefits did not reach statistical significance in the T2DM subgroup. To better understand these findings, we compared the antithrombotic effects of ticagrelor versus with clopidogrel in T2DM patients with cardiovascular disease. In a randomized, 2 treatment-sequence, crossover-design, T2DM patients (n=20, 57±8 years, 60 % male) received a loading-dose [LD] plus one week of daily-therapy [DT] of clopidogrel or ticagrelor. Treatment effects were assessed by measuring thrombus formation (Badimon Chamber) and platelet aggregation (Multiple Electrode Aggregometry (MEA) Analyzer and VerifyNow®) at 2- and 6-hour post-LD and on Day-7 of DT, in comparison with pre-treatment baseline. After 2 weeks of washout, patients switched to the second treatment under identical testing conditions. Ticagrelor significantly reduced thrombus formation versus baseline at 2- and 6-hour post-LD and Day-7 of DT (33 %, 40 % and 31 %, respectively, p<0.01 for all) whereas thrombus reductions with clopidogrel were much lower and significant only at 6-hour post-LD (16 %, 20 % and 17 %, respectively). Antithrombotic effect of ticagrelor at 6-hour was significantly stronger than clopidogrel (p<0.05). Platelet aggregation (MEA and VerifyNow®) was inhibited by both treatments but effects of ticagrelor were significantly stronger at each time-point. Ticagrelor exhibits a faster and more potent antithrombotic effect than clopidogrel in T2DM patients with cardiovascular disease, supporting its use in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zafar et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Type-2 diabetes mellitus with cardiovascular disease (n=20). Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on Reduction in thrombus formation versus baseline at 6-hour post-loading dose (p=<0.05). Ticagrelor exhibited a significantly stronger antithrombotic effect than clopidogrel at 6 hours post-loading dose (40% vs 20% reduction in thrombus formation; p<0.05) in T2DM patients with CVD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: