Key result
The use of intermittent hemodialysis as the initial renal replacement therapy modality, compared to continuous renal replacement therapy, was associated with a significantly increased risk of hemodynamic adverse events (HR 1.74).
Why the study?
Do intermittent RRT modalities compared to CRRT increase the risk of haemodynamic adverse events in ICU patients?
Observational (n=2,153)
Yes
Do intermittent RRT modalities compared to CRRT increase the risk of haemodynamic adverse events in ICU patients?
Hazard Ratio: 1.74 (95% CI 1.28–2.37)
p-value: p=<0.001
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
INTRODUCTION: Haemodynamic adverse events related to renal replacement therapy are a complication of all RRT modalities used in the ICU, including intermittent haemodialysis (IHD), sustained low efficiency dialysis (SLED) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). At present it is unclear which risk factors predispose to HAE and whether these contribute to adverse patient outcomes. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the multinational STARRT-AKI trial to assess factors associated with the occurrence of haemodynamic adverse events (HAE) in patients receiving RRT and whether these HAE were associated with less favourable clinical outcomes. The primary analysis was a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model based on the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), which included time to HAE as the dependent variable. RESULTS: Factors significantly associated with an increased hazard ratio (HR) for HAE during RRT were a higher SOFA score at RRT initiation (HR 1.05; 95% 1.00-1.10), use of IHD as the initial RRT modality in comparison to CRRT (HR 1.74; 95% CI 1.28-2.37) and use of SLED as the initial RRT modality in comparison to CRRT (HR 2.73; 95% CI 1.65-4.51). In a multivariable analysis, adjusted for baseline patient characteristics and RRT initiation covariates, there was no significant association between the occurrence of a HAE during RRT and mortality, dialysis dependence, length of stay, RRT-free days, ventilator-free days or vasoactive-free days, respectively. There was, however, a significant association between multiple haemodynamic adverse events and all-cause mortality at 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: In this secondary analysis of the STARRT-AKI trial, the use of intermittent RRT modalities and higher severity of illness were associated with HAE during RRT. These events were not significantly associated with adverse clinical outcomes, apart from a significant association between multiple HAE and all-cause mortality at 90 days.
In ICU patients requiring RRT, intermittent modalities (IHD and SLED) and higher illness severity are associated with increased haemodynamic adverse events, and multiple events are linked to higher 90-day mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kelly et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Severe acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (n=2,153). Intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) vs. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was evaluated on Time to haemodynamic adverse event (hypotension and/or arrhythmia) during RRT (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.28-2.37, p=<0.001). The use of intermittent hemodialysis as the initial renal replacement therapy modality, compared to continuous renal replacement therapy, was associated with a significantly increased risk of hemodynamic adverse events (HR 1.74).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: