Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Visible-infrared vehicle re-identification across aerial-ground UAV platforms, where high-altitude and low-altitude views are separated by a large viewpoint gap, supports all-day traffic monitoring and cross-platform target association. However, most existing cross-modal re-identification methods are developed for single-platform camera networks with comparable viewpoint geometry across modalities, while cross-view re-identification is studied predominantly in the visible spectrum; the few works that combine the cross-modal dimension with large viewpoint or elevation gaps target pedestrians or elongated non-vehicle objects, and none has been developed for vehicle association in settings where modality discrepancy, aerial-ground viewpoint deformation, and sparse infrared texture co-occur. To address these limitations, we propose Sparse Hierarchical ALignment for Aerial-ground (SHALA), an end-to-end framework built on a frozen DINOv2 backbone. Modality-specific low-rank adapters and learnable view tokens provide modality adaptation and viewpoint compensation with only a small number of trainable parameters. Building on this, Top-K sparsification restricts each patch’s bidirectional cross-modal aggregation to its most relevant counterparts, which limits the influence of background patches and preserves the one-to-many correspondences induced by viewpoint compression. A parallel channel-response stability criterion anchors the foreground representation. On the real-world UCM-VeID benchmark, SHALA attains 41.8%/42.6% Rank-1 in the V2I/I2V directions, surpassing the strongest same-task baseline HWDNet by 2.2%/2.0%. On viewpoint-stratified CARLA pairs, Rank-1 degrades by only 7.2% as the pitch-angle gap widens, whereas representative baselines drop by 18.0–22.5%; the same method ordering reappears on real cross-platform Gold-Standard captures, where SHALA degrades more gracefully than both baselines, and real-data fine-tuning narrows the CARLA-to-UCM-VeID Rank-1 gap from 33.4 to 6.3 percentage points, with the CARLA held-out Rank-1 decreasing from 62.1% to 48.1% as real data is introduced.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: