Key result
Renal sympathetic denervation linked to ~23 bpm heart rate drop in persistent AF with tachycardia.
Why the study?
The effect of renal sympathetic denervation on ventricular heart rate control in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and hypertension was not established.
Does renal sympathetic denervation improve ventricular heart rate control in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and hypertension?
Cohort (n=21)
Does renal sympathetic denervation improve ventricular heart rate control in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and hypertension?
Renal sympathetic denervation significantly reduces ventricular heart rate in a baseline HR-dependent manner in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and hypertension at 7 days.
May aid rate control in persistent AF with high baseline HR; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Aim The aim of this study was to investigate whether renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) improves ventricular heart rate (HR) control in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).Methods and results Twenty-one patients (aged 57.5 ± 10.2 years, 76.2% male) with persistent AF and hypertension underwent RSD and completed 7-days follow-up evaluations, including 24-hour Holter monitoring (Holter), blood pressure (BP), 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Patients were grouped into tertiles of average HR at baseline Holter recording for evaluation of RSD effects on atrioventricular (AV) node (group 1: HR ≧ 90 bpm; group 2: 80 bpm ≦ HR < 90 bpm; group 3: HR < 80 bpm).Results All patients successfully underwent RSD without any complications. The clinical and procedural characteristics were similar in all groups of patients. No significant changes in BP were observed in the three groups before and after RSD. Compared with baseline, the average HR (Holter) of patients in group 1, 2 and 3 had a reduction of 22.6 ± 13.2 bpm (83.3 ± 4.9 vs 106.0 ± 14.6, P= 0.004), 9.7 ± 7.8 bpm (75.7 ± 7.6 vs 85.4 ± 3.7, P= 0.017) and 2.3 ± 2.9 bpm (71.4 ± 4.0 vs 73.7 ± 4.7, P= 0.089) at 7 days after RSD, respectively.Conclusions RSD could improve ventricular HR control in patients with persistent AF. RSD slowed AV node conduction in baseline HRdependent manner. RSD may become an alternative non-pharmaceutical tool for rate control in patients with persistent AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiu et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in persistent atrial fibrillation and hypertension (n=21). Renal sympathetic denervation vs. Baseline was evaluated on ventricular heart rate (HR) control. Renal sympathetic denervation reduced average heart rate by 22.6 bpm (P=0.004) at 7 days in patients with persistent AF and baseline HR ≥90 bpm, demonstrating a baseline HR-dependent effect.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: