Key result
Renal denervation linked to ~23 bpm heart rate reduction in persistent AF.
Why the study?
The effect of renal sympathetic denervation on ventricular heart rate control in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and hypertension was not well established.
Does renal sympathetic denervation improve ventricular heart rate control in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and hypertension?
Cohort (n=21)
Does renal sympathetic denervation improve ventricular heart rate control in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and hypertension?
Renal sympathetic denervation may serve as a non-pharmaceutical tool to improve ventricular rate control in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and hypertension, particularly those with higher baseline heart rates.
May aid short-term rate control in persistent AF with elevated baseline HR; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate whether renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) improves ventricular heart rate (HR) control in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (aged 57.5 ± 10.2 years, 76.2% male) with persistent AF and hypertension underwent RSD and completed 7-days follow-up evaluations, including 24-hour Holter monitoring (Holter), blood pressure (BP), 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Patients were grouped into tertiles of average HR at baseline Holter recording for evaluation of RSD effects on atrioventricular (AV) node (group 1: HR ≧ 90 bpm; group 2: 80 bpm ≦ HR < 90 bpm; group 3: HR < 80 bpm). RESULTS: All patients successfully underwent RSD without any complications. The clinical and procedural characteristics were similar in all groups of patients. No significant changes in BP were observed in the three groups before and after RSD. Compared with baseline, the average HR (Holter) of patients in group 1, 2 and 3 had a reduction of 22.6 ± 13.2 bpm (83.3 ± 4.9 vs 106.0 ± 14.6, P = 0.004), 9.7 ± 7.8 bpm (75.7 ± 7.6 vs 85.4 ± 3.7, P = 0.017) and 2.3 ± 2.9 bpm (71.4 ± 4.0 vs 73.7 ± 4.7, P = 0.089) at 7 days after RSD, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: RSD could improve ventricular HR control in patients with persistent AF. RSD slowed AV node conduction in baseline HR-dependent manner. RSD may become an alternative non-pharmaceutical tool for rate control in patients with persistent AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiu et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation and hypertension (n=21). Renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) vs. Baseline (pre-procedure) was evaluated on ventricular heart rate (HR) control at 7 days. Renal sympathetic denervation significantly reduced average heart rate at 7 days in patients with persistent AF and baseline HR ≥90 bpm (reduction of 22.6 bpm, P=0.004) and 80-89 bpm (P=0.017).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: