Why the study?
Does renal sympathetic denervation reduce atrial fibrillation burden and blood pressure in patients with drug-resistant hypertension and symptomatic atrial fibrillation compared to antiarrhythmic drugs?
Does renal sympathetic denervation reduce atrial fibrillation burden and blood pressure in patients with drug-resistant hypertension and symptomatic atrial fibrillation compared to antiarrhythmic drugs?
This study protocol outlines a randomized trial to evaluate whether renal sympathetic denervation is superior to antiarrhythmic drugs in reducing atrial fibrillation burden and blood pressure in patients with drug-resistant hypertension and symptomatic AF.
This RCT protocol addresses a key evidence gap in comorbid AF and resistant hypertension; leaves open whether denervation outperforms drugs.
BACKGROUND: Recently, catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) has been verified to be safely used to substantially reduce the levels of blood pressure, left ventricular hypertrophy, sleep apnea severity and norepinephrine spillover, and improve glucose tolerance. All these pathological changes are recognized as independent risk factors for the development and recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). A randomized, single-blind, parallel-control, multicenter clinical trial is being conducted to compare RSD with antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) in patients with drug-resistant hypertension and symptomatic AF (RSDforAF trial). METHODS/DESIGN: Patients with drug-resistant hypertension and symptomatic AF will be randomized to RSD and the drug treatment groups. Patients will be followed for 12 months until study closure. Up to 200 patients may be enrolled in six medical centers in China. The primary objective is to study the effects of RSD on AF burden and blood pressure in patients with hypertension and symptomatic AF. DISCUSSION: RSDforAF trial will test the hypothesis that RSD is superior to AAD in reducing AF burden and blood pressure in patients with drug-resistant hypertension and symptomatic AF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01713270.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiu et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: