Key result
Replacing dietary saturated fats with MUFAs or carbohydrates fails to improve flow-mediated dilation.
Why the study?
It is uncertain whether saturated fatty acids impair endothelial function and contribute to arterial stiffening.
Does replacing saturated fatty acids with monounsaturated fatty acids or carbohydrates improve flow-mediated dilation in insulin-resistant men and women?
RCT (n=121)
Randomized
Does replacing saturated fatty acids with monounsaturated fatty acids or carbohydrates improve flow-mediated dilation in insulin-resistant men and women?
Absolute Event Rate: -0.2% vs 0.3%
p-value: p=NS
Replacing saturated fatty acids with monounsaturated fatty acids or carbohydrates for 6 months does not significantly alter endothelial function or arterial stiffness in insulin-resistant individuals.
Replacing SFAs with MUFAs or carbs yields no vascular benefit; challenges hypothesis of SFA-driven endothelial impairment in insulin-resistant adults.
BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether saturated fatty acids (SFAs) impair endothelial function and contribute to arterial stiffening. OBJECTIVE: We tested the effects of replacing SFAs with monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) or carbohydrates on endothelial function and arterial stiffness. DESIGN: With the use of a parallel-designed randomized controlled trial in 121 insulin-resistant men and women, we measured vascular function after 1 mo of consumption of a high-SFA (HS) diet and after 24 wk after random assignment to the HS diet or diets that contained <10% SFAs and were high in either MUFAs or carbohydrates. The primary outcome was a change in flow-mediated dilation (FMD), and secondary outcomes were changes in carotid to femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) and plasma 8-isoprostane F2α-III concentrations. RESULTS: For 112 participants with data available for analysis on the specified outcomes, no significant differences were shown. FMD with the HS reference diet was 6.7 ± 2.2%, and changes (95% CIs) after 6 mo of intervention were +0.3 (-0.4, 1.1), -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5), and -0.1 (-0.6, 0.7) with HS, high-MUFA (HM), and high-carbohydrate (HC) diets, respectively. After consumption of the HS reference diet, the geometric mean (±SD) PWV was 7.67 ± 1.62 m/s, and mean percentages of changes (95% CIs) were -1.0 (-6.2, 4.3) with the HS diet, 2.7 (-1.4, 6.9) with the HM diet, and -1.0 (-5.5, 3.4) with the HC diet. With the HS reference diet, the geometric mean (±SD) plasma 8-isoprostane F2α-III concentration was 176 ± 85 pmol/L, and mean percentage of changes (95% CIs) were 1 (-12, 14) with the HS diet, 6 (-5, 16) with the HM diet, and 4 (-7, 16) with the HC diet. CONCLUSION: The replacement of SFAs with MUFAs or carbohydrates in healthy subjects does not affect vascular function. This trial was registered at Current Controlled Trials (http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN) as ISRCTN 29111298.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanders et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Insulin resistance (n=121). High-MUFA or high-carbohydrate diets vs. High-SFA (HS) diet was evaluated on Change in flow-mediated dilation (FMD) (p=NS). Replacing saturated fatty acids with monounsaturated fatty acids or carbohydrates for 6 months did not significantly change flow-mediated dilation compared to a high-SFA diet.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: