Key result
Elective CABG carries a ~24% six-month readmission rate, driven primarily by cardiac diagnoses.
Why the study?
Rehospitalization after elective CABG operations is an important but neglected measure of early morbidity that requires further characterization.
What is the rate and what are the risk factors for rehospitalization within six months after elective CABG?
Cohort (n=326)
Yes
What is the rate and what are the risk factors for rehospitalization within six months after elective CABG?
Nearly a quarter of patients are readmitted within six months after elective CABG, highlighting the need for careful surveillance of high-risk patients.
One neglected but important measure of early morbidity after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) operations is rehospitalization. As part of a prospective study of recovery after elective CABG procedures conducted at four academic medical centers, data from all readmissions occurring within the first six postoperative months were collected for 326 patients. A total of 24% of patients had readmissions. The most common categories of readmission discharge diagnoses were cardiac (57%), noncardiac (26%), and surgical sequelae (17%). Factors from the initial hospitalization identified as risk factors for rehospitalization included: length of stay in intensive care unit after surgery, severe noncardiac complications, duration of preoperative cardiac symptoms, intra-aortic balloon insertion, and preoperative resting angina. These findings help to identify a subset of at risk patients for whom more careful surveillance might be beneficial. (JAMA1985;253:3568-3573)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Babette Ann Stanton (1985) conducted a cohort in Recovery after elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (n=326). Elective CABG procedures was evaluated on Readmission within the first six postoperative months. Within six months after elective CABG procedures, 24% of patients required hospital readmission, most commonly for cardiac diagnoses (57%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: