This study investigates the wind-induced response of a transmission tower-line system with an initial inclination induced by differential foundation settlement. A two-tower, three-span finite element model is established for a 220 kV tangent tower in a goaf area of Ordos, China. The allowable inclination ratio of 0.5% is adopted to define the initial settlement state. Single-support, two-support, and three-support settlement modes are considered together with wind acting either along or opposite to the settlement-induced initial lateral displacement, resulting in six cases. At the 0.5% inclination limit, the required settlements are 0.0721, 0.0422, and 0.0706 m, respectively. Although the two-support case requires the smallest settlement, it produces the largest local axial stresses in the middle and lower crossarms. Under along-settlement wind, the mean tower-top displacement, middle-crossarm conductor attachment point (CAP) displacement, and axial-stress amplitude increase by 44.09–49.02%, 38.60–47.91%, and 86.23–174.76%, respectively, relative to the corresponding static settlement states. Under opposite-settlement wind, the peak tower-top displacement decreases by 42.8–44.5% relative to the along-settlement cases. Overall, two-support settlement combined with along-settlement wind produces the largest local stress response among the investigated cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: