Partial organic substitution is being increasingly recognized as a promising strategy for regenerative agriculture. However, its integrated agronomic, ecological, and environmental performance in field-scale vegetable rotation systems, particularly under the humid subtropical conditions of South China, remains insufficiently investigated. Based on a 13-year field experiment, this study examined the effects of partial organic substitution on soil health, vegetable yield, and greenhouse gas emissions. Three fertilization regimes were compared: (1) an unfertilized control; (2) chemical fertilizer alone (CF); and (3) combined chemical and organic fertilization (CF+OF), in which 50% of chemical nitrogen was replaced with organic fertilizer. Compared with CF, CF + OF increased the soil health index by 14.3%, primarily owing to improvements in soil chemical and biological properties. Although vegetable yield was numerically higher under CF + OF than under CF (3.8%–7.2%), the differences was not statistically significant. CF + OF practice significantly reduced N 2 O emissions by 50.2%, primarily due to lower ammonium nitrogen availability and increased soil pH, and showed the lowest yield-scaled global warming potential (39.7 kg CO 2 eq Mg −1 ). A comprehensive sustainability index—integrating crop yield, N 2 O emissions, net CO 2 sequestration, yield-scaled global warming potential, and soil health—ranked CF + OF highest (0.80), followed by CF (0.55). Overall, these findings demonstrate that replacing 50% substitution of chemical nitrogen with organic fertilizer is a scientifically supported and practical strategy for promoting regenerative agriculture and sustainable intensification in long-term vegetable rotation systems under the humid subtropical climate of South China.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: