Use Characteristics of Indexed Scholarly Communication Venues (ISCVs): The Case of Library and Information Science Scholars in Nigeria

This study investigated the use of indexed scholarly communication venues (ISCVs) by Library and Information Science scholars in universities in Southwest Nigeria. ISCVs, such as Scopus- and Web of Science-indexed journals, are widely regarded as indicators of research quality, visibility, and academic prestige. Using a survey research design of the ex post facto type, data were collected from 374 LIS scholars comprising librarians and lecturers. A structured questionnaire with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.917 was administered both physically and online. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations. Findings revealed that while 88.2% of respondents were aware of institutional policies requiring indexed publications, actual publishing experience in ISCVs remained low, with 68.2% reporting fewer than five or no indexed articles. Scopus was the most preferred database (59.6%), reflecting its global prominence and use in university rankings. Overall, ISCV use was moderate (x̅ = 2.68) across dimensions of frequency, purpose, satisfaction, and impact. Scholars mainly published for visibility, collaboration, career advancement, and prestige, but reported limited benefits such as accelerated promotions, incentives, or policy influence. The study highlights a gap between policy awareness and publishing outcomes, suggesting the need for stronger institutional support.