Key result
Systolic BP-to-height ratio accurately identifies pediatric hypertension with an AUC of 0.95.
Why the study?
The diagnosis of hypertension in children is difficult due to multiple sex-, age-, and height-specific BP thresholds, and BPHR has been proposed to simplify identification.
Does blood pressure-to-height ratio at a single screening visit accurately identify hypertension in children?
Cross-Sectional (n=5,207)
Does blood pressure-to-height ratio at a single screening visit accurately identify hypertension in children?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.95
Absolute Event Rate: 0.95% vs 0.84%
p-value: p=<0.001
BPHR at a single screening visit is a highly sensitive tool for identifying hypertension in children, though its positive predictive value is limited by the low prevalence of the condition.
Supports BPHR for ruling out pediatric hypertension at screening; leaves open prospective validation before practice adoption.
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of hypertension in children is difficult because of the multiple sex-, age-, and height-specific thresholds to define elevated blood pressure (BP). Blood pressure-to-height ratio (BPHR) has been proposed to facilitate the identification of elevated BP in children. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the performance of BPHR at a single screening visit to identify children with hypertension that is sustained elevated BP. METHOD: In a school-based study conducted in Switzerland, BP was measured at up to three visits in 5207 children. Children had hypertension if BP was elevated at the three visits. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) for the identification of hypertension were assessed for different thresholds of BPHR. The ability of BPHR at a single screening visit to discriminate children with and without hypertension was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. RESULTS: The prevalence of systolic/diastolic hypertension was 2.2%. Systolic BPHR had a better performance to identify hypertension compared with diastolic BPHR (area under the ROC curve: 0.95 vs. 0.84). The highest performance was obtained with a systolic BPHR threshold set at 0.80 mmHg/cm (sensitivity: 98%; specificity: 85%; PPV: 12%; and NPV: 100%) and a diastolic BPHR threshold set at 0.45 mmHg/cm (sensitivity: 79%; specificity: 70%; PPV: 5%; and NPV: 99%). The PPV was higher among tall or overweight children. CONCLUSION: BPHR at a single screening visit had a high performance to identify hypertension in children, although the low prevalence of hypertension led to a low PPV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Outdili et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=5,207). Systolic blood pressure-to-height ratio (BPHR) vs. Diastolic BPHR was evaluated on Discrimination of children with and without hypertension (Area under the ROC curve) (AUC 0.95, p=<0.001). Systolic blood pressure-to-height ratio demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for identifying hypertension in children, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.95 compared to 0.84 for diastolic ratio.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: