Key result
Adaptive postural balance rehab increases odds of metabolic response by ~109% vs aerobic exercise.
Why the study?
Does adaptive postural balance cardiac rehabilitation exercise improve metabolic and exercise responder rates compared to aerobic exercise in patients with coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes?
RCT (n=167)
randomized
Does adaptive postural balance cardiac rehabilitation exercise improve metabolic and exercise responder rates compared to aerobic exercise in patients with coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes?
Odds Ratio: 2.09 (95% CI 1.03–4.25)
Absolute Event Rate: 48.3% vs 32.5%
p-value: p=0.043
Adaptive postural balance cardiac rehabilitation exercise yields higher rates of clinically meaningful metabolic and exercise responses than standard aerobic exercise in patients with CAD and T2DM.
Supports adaptive balance training in cardiac rehab for CAD with T2DM; extends aerobic exercise evidence in comorbid populations.
Background Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) show variable responses to exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation. We compared metabolic and exercise responder rates after adaptive postural balance cardiac rehabilitation exercise (APBCRE) versus aerobic exercise (AE) and explored baseline factors associated with responder status.Methods This pre-specified secondary analysis included 167 patients with CAD and T2DM from a randomized trial who completed an 8-week intervention (APBCRE, n = 87; AE, n = 80). Metabolic response was defined as an HbA1c reduction of ≥0.5%, and exercise response as a VO2max increase of ≥3.5 mL·kg−1·min−1. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated associated factors.Results APBCRE was associated with higher metabolic (48.3% vs 32.5%, P < 0.05) and exercise responder rates (31.0% vs 11.3%, P < 0.01) than AE. APBCRE was independently associated with metabolic response (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.03-4.25; P = 0.043) and exercise response (OR 3.66, 95% CI 1.55-8.65; P = 0.003). Higher baseline HbA1c was associated with metabolic response (OR 5.04, 95% CI 2.14-11.86; P < 0.001), whereas insulin therapy was inversely associated (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.90; P = 0.034). Lower baseline VO2max was associated with exercise response (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.97; P = 0.016).Conclusions APBCRE was associated with higher rates of clinically meaningful metabolic and exercise responses than AE. Responder analysis complements conventional outcome assessment and may support individualized cardiac rehabilitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
秦德余 et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=167). Adaptive postural balance cardiac rehabilitation exercise (APBCRE) vs. Aerobic exercise (AE) was evaluated on Metabolic response (HbA1c reduction of ≥0.5%) (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.03-4.25, p=0.043). Adaptive postural balance cardiac rehabilitation exercise yielded higher metabolic responder rates than aerobic exercise (48.3% vs 32.5%; OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.03-4.25; P=0.043).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: