We develop Subjectivity-Intersection Braid Quantum Gravity as a source-explicit mathematical quantum-gravity candidate in which a public Lorentzian spacetime carrier is generated by intersections of nonidentical, standpoint-bearing pointed-Braid processes. Version 0.91 retains the complete v0.9 finite Lorentz parent, four-component Ward identity, scoped Einstein equation G=(3/5)T, two-helicity spin-2 limit, derived matter-sector construction, calibration boundary, AF/quasi-local all-refinement channel, rank-three constraint closure, anisotropic UCP carrier, and all-finite-iteration backreaction. It adds a finite quantum reconstruction and control analysis through BGCE491. The actual oriented three-history cycle generates a 36-dimensional complex carrier; source reversal and cup/cap counting yield normalized squared-norm probabilities in the declared projective class; and retained source morphisms generate an exact Z2 superselection and observable algebra M18(C) direct-sum M18(C). Canonically compressed source controls define a six-order mixed-unitary CPTP engine. A typed source-word extension supplies exact LCU block encodings, a four-probability control solder, a raw-source signal qubit, and exact heralded actuation for all 32 sector/control cases. The first Lagrange black-box route retains a 10^23.14 to 10^44.43 query NO-GO. A source-compatible Chebyshev conversion instead gives exact deterministic circuits using 203 to 39,102 block-encoding queries, and hermitianization of the existing source-word LCU unitary removes explicit square-root-defect and spectral-read primitives. The construction is scoped: ordinary flip also generates a complex sector, the typed selector and success-address mark are explicit extensions, no hardware has executed the engine, and no competitor-divergent gravity-apparatus measurement has been performed. No empirical validation of quantum gravity is claimed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Satoru Watanabe (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: