Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cu(In,Al)Se 2 (CIAS)‐based thin‐film solar cells remain largely unexplored regarding buffer layer and interface engineering. This work reports a SCAPS‐1D investigation of CuAlSe 2 (CASe) as a cadmium‐free alternative to CdS, starting from a validated Glass/Mo/CIAS/CdS/ZnO/ITO/(Ni/Al)/MgF 2 model reproducing experimental results. Replacing CdS with CASe maintains constant short‐circuit current density while improving band alignment at the buffer/absorber interface, reducing interfacial recombination and raising open‐circuit voltage ( V OC ), without additional parasitic absorption losses. A parametric analysis identifies an optimal CASe thickness of 0.01 µm nm and an optimal conduction band offset of −0.25 eV at the CASe/CIAS interface, yielding a simulated efficiency of 25.03%. Integrating a NiO hole transport layer suppresses back‐contact recombination, raising efficiency to 26.39% ( J SC = 33.06 mA/cm 2 , V OC = 1.1 V, FF = 73.77%), versus 16.9% ( J SC = 36.00 mA/cm 2 , V OC = 0.621 V, FF = 75.5%) for the CdS‐based reference device. In addition, an unconventional thermal behavior is revealed within the 280–360 K range, where V OC and efficiency increase with temperature, attributed to a progressive improvement of the CASe/CIAS interfacial band alignment that outweighs intrinsic thermally activated recombination losses. These results identify CASe as a promising, previously unexplored cadmium‐free buffer material for CIAS solar cells, warranting experimental investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pierre Gérard Darel Kond Ngue (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: