Key result
Telmisartan plus HCTZ matches amlodipine plus HCTZ for lowering last 6-hour mean SBP.
Why the study?
Sustained blood pressure control is important to reduce cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk in the elderly with predominantly systolic hypertension.
Does telmisartan plus hydrochlorothiazide improve blood pressure reduction compared to amlodipine plus hydrochlorothiazide in older patients with predominantly systolic hypertension?
RCT (n=683)
Open-label, blinded-endpoint
randomized
Yes
Does telmisartan plus hydrochlorothiazide improve blood pressure reduction compared to amlodipine plus hydrochlorothiazide in older patients with predominantly systolic hypertension?
Mean Difference: -1.1 (95% CI -2.7–0.5)
Absolute Event Rate: 18.8% vs 17.7%
Telmisartan plus hydrochlorothiazide is at least as effective as amlodipine plus hydrochlorothiazide for blood pressure control in older patients with systolic hypertension, but with a significantly better safety profile regarding peripheral edema.
Telmisartan-HCTZ offers a noninferior SBP-lowering option in older patients; confirms comparable efficacy to amlodipine-HCTZ.
Sustained blood pressure control is important to reduce cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk in the elderly. A prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint, multicenter, parallel-group study was performed in older patients (≥60 years) with systolic blood pressure (SBP) >140 mg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≤95 mmHg, and 24-h mean ambulatory SBP >125 mmHg. After a 2- to 4-week placebo run-in, patients were randomized to treatment with telmisartan (T) 40 mg for 2 weeks, with uptitration to T 80 mg for 6 weeks and then to T 80 mg + hydrochlorothiazide (H) 12.5 mg for 6 weeks or amlodipine (A) 5 mg, with uptitration to A 10 mg for 6 weeks and then to A 10 mg + H 12.5 mg for 6 weeks. Efficacy was determined using 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored. The reduction from baseline adjusted last 6-h mean SBP (primary endpoint) was 18.8±0.6 mmHg for T+H (n=354) and 17.7±0.6 mmHg for A+H (n=329). The difference in favor of T+H versus A+H of −1.1 mmHg (95% CI −2.7, 0.5 mmHg) confirmed that T+H was at least as effective as A+H. Reductions in 24-h mean SBP (p=0.0010), daytime SBP (p=0.0002), and morning mean SBP (p=0.0105) were greater with T+H than with A+H. T+H was also superior to A+H for DBP endpoints. Drug-related AEs occurred in 40 (8.0%) T-group patients and in 168 (33.4%) A-group patients (p<0.0001). The most common AE was peripheral edema, observed in 6 (1.2%) T-group patients and 122 (24.3%) A-group patients (p<0.0001). T 80 mg + H 12.5 mg is statistically superior to A 10 mg + H 12.5 mg during the 24-h dosing interval for both SBP and DBP; with both groups being comparable in the last 6 h, the time of heightened cardiovascular risk. The safety profile of T+H is superior to that of A+H.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steen Neldam (2005) conducted an RCT in Predominantly systolic hypertension (n=683). Telmisartan + hydrochlorothiazide vs. Amlodipine 5 mg for 2 weeks, uptitrated to 10 mg for 6 weeks, then 10 mg + hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg for 6 weeks was evaluated on Reduction from baseline adjusted last 6-h mean SBP (MD -1.1 mmHg, 95% CI -2.7, 0.5). Telmisartan plus hydrochlorothiazide was at least as effective as amlodipine plus hydrochlorothiazide in reducing the last 6-h mean SBP (difference -1.1 mmHg; 95% CI -2.7 to 0.5).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: