Key result
Left atrial indices identify elevated PCWP with ~75% sensitivity and ~77% specificity.
Why the study?
The predictive value of left atrial cavity and myocardial function measurements for pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was not well established.
Do left atrial cavity and myocardial function measurements accurately predict raised pulmonary capillary wedge pressure?
Comparison
Left atrial cavity and myocardial function measurements vs pulmonary capillary wedge pressure
Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Loading...
LA strain and size predict elevated PCWP; extends correlations with quantified accuracy for noninvasive estimation in research.
Meta-Analysis (n=1,343)
Do left atrial cavity and myocardial function measurements accurately predict raised pulmonary capillary wedge pressure?
Effect estimate: Sensitivity 75%, Specificity 77% (95% CI 55-89)
Left atrial size and myocardial function indices demonstrate moderate diagnostic accuracy for predicting elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, offering a non-invasive method to assist in hemodynamic monitoring.
Bytyçi et al. (2019) conducted a meta-analysis in Raised pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (n=1,343). Left atrial indices (LA diameter, LAVI, PALS, PACS, LAEF) was evaluated on Prediction of raised pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (Sensitivity 75%, Specificity 77%, 95% CI 55-89). Left atrial indices predicted raised pulmonary capillary wedge pressure with a summary sensitivity of 75% (95% CI 55-89) and summary specificity of 77% (95% CI 57-90).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: