Why the study?
Does phasic pulmonary capillary wedge pressure accurately estimate mitral valve gradients and areas compared to direct left atrial pressure in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization?
Does phasic pulmonary capillary wedge pressure accurately estimate mitral valve gradients and areas compared to direct left atrial pressure in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization?
Using pulmonary capillary wedge pressure instead of direct left atrial pressure overestimates mitral valve gradients and underestimates valve areas, which could lead to incorrect clinical decisions regarding mitral valve disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May prompt caution using phasic PCW for mitral assessment; leaves open need for direct LA pressure validation studies.
We investigated the relationship between left atrial (LA) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCW) in order to define the clinical settings in which PCW may be used to approximate LA pressure and to determine the cause and significance of difference between LA and PCW pressures. Nineteen patients who at cardiac catheterization had LA, PCW, and left ventricular (LV) pressures recorded, had mitral valve gradients and areas determined. Mean PCW and LA pressures correlated well (r = 0.94). Phasic PCW consistently overestimated the MV gradient and underestimated the MV area compared to LA pressure, (8 +/- 4 versus 4 +/- 3 mm Hg, p less than 0.001, 1.3 +/- 0.3 versus 1.6 +/- 0.3 cm2, p less than 0.005, respectively). Three patients had abnormal MV prosthesis function assessed by PCW pressure but not by LA pressure. Diastolic MV gradients between PCW and LV were caused or increased by a slowed y descent in the PCW tracing. Using the PCW pressure may falsely elevate MV gradients and falsely reduce MV areas and lead to incorrect clinical action.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hosenpud et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: