Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Autopsy study reveals high rates of right ventricular abnormalities and coronary sclerosis in liver cirrhosis, indicating widespread cardiac involvement.
BACKGROUND: Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy is a recently defined cardiac disorder in patients with end-stage liver disease. The frequency and exact manifestations of cardiac changes in liver cirrhosis is unknown. GOALS: We aim to describe cardiac changes in a large autopsy study of patients with liver cirrhosis. STUDY: Postmortem data from 895 individuals with liver cirrhosis of different origin autopsied from 1995 to 2010 were analyzed. A total of 236 patients were excluded, mostly due to an advanced age above 70 years. The remaining 659 patients were assigned to 4 subgroups according to the etiology of cirrhosis: alcoholic cirrhosis (57.4%), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (4.2%), viral hepatitis (9.3%), and cryptogenic cirrhosis (29.1%). Predefined clinical and cardiac parameters were assessed in these groups and compared by univariate and multivariate analyses to an age-matched and sex-matched control group including 40 deceased patients without evidence of chronic liver disease. RESULTS: A critical heart weight (24%, P=0.024), hypertrophy of the right ventricle (24%, P<0.001), and dilatation of the right ventricle (36%, P=0.040) were significantly more frequent in the cirrhosis group compared with noncirrhotic controls. Cirrhosis patients had a greater risk for high-grade coronary sclerosis (30%, P=0.019). The etiology of cirrhosis was independently associated with hypertrophy and dilatation of the right ventricle, with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis patients being at the highest risk. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate a high rate of right-ventricular abnormalities and coronary sclerosis in individuals suffering from liver cirrhosis regardless of the etiology of cirrhosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wehmeyer et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: