Key result
COstatus monitor detects intracardiac left-to-right shunts with ~96% sensitivity, but underestimates smaller shunts.
Why the study?
Echocardiography can diagnose intracardiac shunts in children but cannot estimate the shunt ratio, which influences treatment options.
Does the COstatus monitor accurately detect and estimate intracardiac shunts compared to invasive reference techniques in young children undergoing corrective cardiac surgery?
Observational (n=44)
No
Does the COstatus monitor accurately detect and estimate intracardiac shunts compared to invasive reference techniques in young children undergoing corrective cardiac surgery?
The COstatus monitor is a highly sensitive and specific, less-invasive tool for detecting intracardiac shunts in young children, though it may underestimate the shunt ratio in small to moderate defects compared to invasive reference methods.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid noninvasive shunt detection; leaves open validation for accurate quantification of smaller defects.
Clinical evaluation of intracardiac shunts in children is not straightforward. Echocardiography can only diagnose the presence of a shunt but does not estimate the shunt ratio. This can be a critical factor that influences treatment options. In this single-center, prospective, observational, method-comparison study, we validate the ability of a novel monitoring device COstatus to estimate the intracardiac shunt ratio (Qp/Qs) of pulmonary (Qp) to systemic (Qs) blood flow in young children before and after corrective cardiac surgery. The indicator dilution technology COstatus monitor was compared to two other more invasive reference techniques, perivascular ultrasonic flow probes (placed around the pulmonary truncus and ascending aorta) and the oximetric shunt equation (using arterial and venous blood gases). Our study revealed that the COstatus monitor detected intracardiac shunts with high sensitivity and specificity but there was some underestimation of the shunt ratios compared to the reference techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sigurdsson et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Intracardiac shunts (atrial and/or ventricular septal defects) (n=44). COstatus monitor vs. Perivascular ultrasonic flow probes and oximetric shunt equation was evaluated on Accuracy in discriminating between the presence of a left-to-right shunt and no shunt (Sensitivity 95.7%, Specificity 97.6%, AUC 0.97). The COstatus monitor detected intracardiac left-to-right shunts with 95.7% sensitivity and 97.6% specificity, though it underestimated shunt ratios in moderate and small shunts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: