Why the study?
Does mathematical analysis of thermodilution curves accurately quantify shunt fractions compared to oximetry in patients with congenital heart defects?
Does mathematical analysis of thermodilution curves accurately quantify shunt fractions compared to oximetry in patients with congenital heart defects?
Mathematical analysis of thermodilution curves provides shunt fraction estimates that closely agree with oximetric determinations for left-to-right shunts in patients with congenital heart defects.
Thermodilution curve analysis may offer an alternative for shunt quantification in congenital defects; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Mathematical models are presented for describing and analyzing indicator dilution curves recorded in patients with intracardiac and great vessel shunts. The models treat individual segments of the circulation as linear system blocks, each having, at its output, a characteristic time response to a rapid injection of indicator at its input. These blocks are combined in feedback and feed-forward configurations to simulate left-to-right, right-to-left, and bidirectional shunts. A shunt analysis algorithm, using discrete analogs of the linear system models, was implemented in a computer program and used to analyze thermodilution curves recorded in patients with congenital heart defects. Results are presented comparing shunt fractions obtained from thermodilution curve analyses with oximetrically determined values in 20 patients. Comparing left-to-right shunts measured by the two methods, the mean systematic difference was 0.7% of pulmonary flow and the standard deviation was 7.6% of pulmonary flow. Statistical validation of the bidirectional shunt method will require acquisition and analysis of more data; however, reasonable shunt fractions were computed in five cases studied and good agreement with oximetric determinations was obtained in two cases where complete oximetric data were available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Billings et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: