Key result
The wearable opto-electronic patch sensor (OEPS) demonstrated high agreement with commercial devices for heart rate monitoring during physical activity, yielding a mean difference of 0.08 bpm and a correlation of 0.97.
Why the study?
Does a wearable opto-electronic patch sensor (OEPS) accurately measure physiological parameters compared to commercial devices during motion?
Population
16 healthy subjects
Comparison
Wearable opto-electronic patch sensor comprising… vs Commercial devices/probe
Design
Other
Authors
Loading...
OEPS may support motion-robust ambulatory monitoring; leaves open prospective clinical validation before practice change.
Observational (n=16)
No
Does a wearable opto-electronic patch sensor (OEPS) accurately measure physiological parameters compared to commercial devices during motion?
Mean Difference: 0.08
Absolute Event Rate: 77.58% vs 77.5%
The OEPS wearable sensor demonstrates high accuracy and agreement with commercial devices for heart rate monitoring while effectively reducing motion artifacts.
Alzahrani et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=16). Wearable opto-electronic patch sensor (OEPS) with 3-axis MEMS accelerometer vs. Commercial devices (Nellcor probe, Omron blood pressure meter) was evaluated on Heart rate (bpm) (Mean difference 0.08). The wearable opto-electronic patch sensor (OEPS) demonstrated high agreement with commercial devices for heart rate monitoring during physical activity, yielding a mean difference of 0.08 bpm and a correlation of 0.97.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: