Spectral measurements of fresh and dehydrated Douglas-fir foliage, from trees cultivated under three fertilization treatments, were acquired with a laboratory spectrophotometer. The slope (first-derivative) of the fresh- and dry-leaf absorbance spectra at locations near known protein absorption features was strongly correlated with total nitrogen (TN) concentration of the foliage samples. A particularly strong correlation was observed between the first-derivative spectra in the 2150-2170 nm region and TN, reaching a local maximum in the fresh-leaf spectra of — 0-84 at 2160 nm. Stepwise regression was used to generate calibration equations relating first-derivative spectra from fresh, dry/ intact, and dr/ ground samples to TN concentration. Standard errors of calibration were 1.52 mgg−1 (fresh) 1-33 mgg−1(dry/ intact) and 1-20 mgg− 1(dry/ mground), with a goodness-of-fit of 0-94 and greater. Cross-validation was performed with the fresh-leaf dataset to examine the predictive capability of the regression method; standard errors of prediction ranged from 1-47-237 mgg-1 across seven different validation sets, prediction goodness of fit ranged from 0-85-0-94, and wavelength selection was fairly insensitive to the membership of the calibration set. All regressions in this study tended to select wavelengths in the 2100-2350 nm region, with the primary selection in the 2142-2172 nm region. The study provides positive evidence concerning the feasibility of assessing TN status of fresh-leaf samples by spectrometry; means. We assert that the ability to extract biochemical information from fresh-leaf spectra is a necessary but insufficient condition regarding the use of remote sensing for canopy-level biochemical estimation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: