Key result
Abnormal ECG linked to ~5-fold higher risk of dipyridamole side effects during perfusion imaging.
Why the study?
The association of dipyridamole side effects with hemodynamic oscillations, ECG findings, and myocardial perfusion imaging results was not well characterized.
Are dipyridamole side effects associated with hemodynamic parameters, ECG findings, and scintigraphy outcomes in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging?
Observational (n=590)
Are dipyridamole side effects associated with hemodynamic parameters, ECG findings, and scintigraphy outcomes in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging?
Absolute Event Rate: 32.9% vs 6.2%
p-value: p=<0.05
Dipyridamole-induced side effects during myocardial perfusion imaging are associated with specific hemodynamic changes, but these hemodynamic changes do not correlate with abnormal ECG or imaging results.
Side effects correlate with hemodynamic shifts but not imaging or ECG results; leaves open any predictive role in perfusion imaging.
UNLABELLED: Dipyridamole has extensively been administered as a substitute for physical activity in cardiovascular assessment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of dipyridamole side effects with hemodynamic oscillations, scanning results, and electrocardiography (ECG) findings. METHODS: Overall, 590 patients referred to the nuclear medicine center for myocardial perfusion imaging were evaluated for adverse dipyridamole effects concurrent with a low level of exercise. Before and during dipyridamole infusion, the patients' vital signs, electrocardiogram, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure were monitored; all patients underwent stress-rest (99m)Tc-sestamibi gated SPECT using a 2-d protocol. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients (14.9%) experienced at least one side effect during dipyridamole infusion, and abnormal ECG and scan results were observed in 32.4% and 48.6% of patients, respectively. We observed a positive correlation between a higher incidence of chest discomfort, headache, and dyspnea and abnormalities on ECG and myocardial perfusion imaging. In addition, these 3 side effects were also associated with a higher postinfusion heart rate, lower preinfusion systolic blood pressure, and lower postinfusion diastolic blood pressure. There were significant differences between pre- and postinfusion heart rate, preinfusion systolic blood pressure, and postinfusion diastolic blood pressure among patients with or without side effects, whereas no significant difference was observed in any of the hemodynamic parameters between patients with normal and abnormal ECG results or myocardial perfusion imaging results. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a correlation between hemodynamic variables and side effects but not with imaging findings or ECG findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Javadi et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Suspected coronary artery disease (n=590). Dipyridamole vs. Patients with normal ECG or scan findings was evaluated on Incidence of dipyridamole side effects in patients with abnormal versus normal ECG findings (p=<0.05). Dipyridamole side effects occurred in 14.9% of patients and were significantly more frequent in those with abnormal ECGs (32.9% vs 6.2%) and abnormal myocardial perfusion scans (22.6% vs 7.5%).
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: