Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
For a sustainable-energy system, the industrial carbon emission should be zero or close to it. The partial capture of CO 2, i.e., capturing only a share of the CO 2, is discussed as an option for initiating the transition toward the decarbonization of industry by reducing the CO 2 mitigation cost at industrial sites. This work models two approaches to achieving partial capture based on amine absorption: (1) capturing 90% CO 2 from a split stream of the flue gas or (2) capturing less CO 2 (≪90%) from the total flue-gas flow. A techno-economic analysis is carried out that considers scale, CO 2 concentration, and process configurations (absorber intercooling and rich solvent splitting) when comparing the cost of partial capture to full capture, i.e., capturing close to all CO 2 from the entire gas. Besides lowering absolute costs, the study shows that partial capture from CO 2 -rich gases may also lower specific cost (€ per tonne of CO 2 captured) compared to full capture, despite the economy of scale, during certain market conditions. Operating expenditures, especially the cost of steam, are found to be dominating cost factors for partial capture, even for capture down to 200 000 tonnes per year.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biermann et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: