Key result
Rotigaptide reduces cumulative defibrillation voltage requirements by ~30% vs control in ventricular fibrillation.
Why the study?
Rotigaptide, a gap junction modifier that promotes cellular coupling, was hypothesized to decrease defibrillation thresholds during prolonged ventricular fibrillation.
Does Rotigaptide decrease defibrillation voltage requirements in rabbits with prolonged ventricular fibrillation?
RCT (n=32)
Randomized
Does Rotigaptide decrease defibrillation voltage requirements in rabbits with prolonged ventricular fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 844% vs 1206%
p-value: p=.002
Rotigaptide, a gap junction modifier, significantly reduces the defibrillation voltage required after prolonged untreated ventricular fibrillation in a rabbit model.
Hypothesis-generating for gap junction modulation in VF; does not support clinical translation or practice change.
The gap junction modifier Rotigaptide (ZP123), which promotes cellular coupling, was hypothesized to decrease defibrillation thresholds during prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF). Thirty-two New Zealand white rabbits were randomized to receive saline (control, n = 16) or Rotigaptide (n = 16). Following 4 min of untreated VF, biphasic defibrillation shocks were applied through chest wall patches, starting either at 300 volts (V) (n = 16) or 500 V (n = 16), with 200 V increasing steps to 900 V in case of shock failure. Rotigaptide significantly decreased defibrillation voltage requirements (average cumulative voltage of all shocks: 1206 +/- 709 V in control group vs. 844 +/- 546 V in treated group, P = .002). Rotigaptide had no effect on heart rate, QRS duration, QT interval, ventricular effective refractory period, monophasic action potential duration or on connexin 43 density using immunofluorescence. Rotigaptide improves the ability to defibrillate after untreated VF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laurent et al. (2007) conducted an RCT in Ventricular fibrillation / Cardiac arrest (n=32). Rotigaptide (ZP123) vs. Saline was evaluated on Average cumulative voltage of all shocks (p=.002). Rotigaptide significantly decreased average cumulative defibrillation voltage requirements compared to saline control (844 ± 546 V vs 1206 ± 709 V, P=.002) in rabbits with ventricular fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: