Key result
Nocturnal BP dipping linked to ~40% lower mortality vs. nondipping in CKD.
Why the study?
Nondipping blood pressure is common in CKD, but the prevalence, risk compared to non-CKD patients, and associated adverse outcomes were not well defined.
Is nondipping blood pressure status associated with increased mortality, cardiovascular events, and disease progression in patients with chronic kidney disease?
Meta-Analysis (n=54,515)
Is nondipping blood pressure status associated with increased mortality, cardiovascular events, and disease progression in patients with chronic kidney disease?
Relative Risk: 0.6 (95% CI 0.49–0.72)
p-value: p=<0.001
Nondipping blood pressure is highly prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease and is significantly associated with increased risks of mortality, cardiovascular events, and disease progression.
Nondipping may identify higher-risk CKD patients; extends observational data but leaves open whether restoring dipping improves outcomes.
Background Nondipping, <10% nighttime blood pressure reduction, is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD). We conducted a systematic review to determine CKD nondipper prevalence, nondipper risk between patients with and without CKD and adverse events associated with nondippers in CKD. Methods CKD population studies undergoing an automated blood pressure monitor were searched for on MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL (December 2023), included if they had nondipper information and excluded if they examined only a specific population. Random‐effects analysis was conducted to determine prevalence and relative risk (RR) with 95% CI. Risk of bias was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute score for prevalence studies and Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale for observational studies. A sensitivity analysis excluded studied with a high risk of bias. Heterogeneity was examined using I 2 and SD. Results We included 63 articles with 54 515 patients; 33 825 with CKD and 20 690 without CKD. CKD nondipper prevalence was 0.53 (95% CI, 0.52–0.53, SD=13.5%). Compared with patients with CKD, those without CKD had a lower risk of nondipping status (RR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.63–0.75], SD=14.1%, P <0.001). Similar findings were seen in the sensitivity analysis. CKD, dippers compared with nondippers, was associated with a lower mortality (RR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.49–0.72], SD=3.2%, P <0.001), cardiovascular events (RR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.47–0.85], SD=28.3%, P <0.001), and CKD progression (RR, 0.64 [95% CI 0.55–0.75], SD=14.1%, P <0.001). Conclusions Nondipping is prevalent in CKD, with CKD itself a risk factor. Nondipping was associated with mortality, cardiovascular event, and CKD progression. Almost all included studies were retrospective cohorts, with a high heterogeneity found.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdallah et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Chronic kidney disease (n=54,515). Dipping status vs. Nondipping status was evaluated on mortality (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.49-0.72, p=<0.001). In patients with chronic kidney disease, dipping compared with nondipping was associated with lower mortality (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.49-0.72; P<0.001), cardiovascular events, and CKD progression.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: